Just when he was getting really uncomfortable, Sheriff Joe Arpaio escaped on Monday night from the Walter Cronkite School of Journalism and Mass Communication at Arizona State University. He stepped off the podium. His aides led him away.
I’ll tell you why.
First, though, full disclosure.
I am the writer-in-residence at the Cronkite school. I am writing a book about the undocumented underground in Arizona. The professors who grilled Arpaio in the aborted Meet-the-Press-style forum are my colleagues. This blog, however, is not affiliated with ASU. It is my personal blog. No one tells me what to write. Hey, I even follow the writing rules of the Chicago Manual of Style, which is more writerly than Associated Press style, which journalism schools tend to use.
Okay. Back to the story.
In August, when I spoke with Sheriff Joe, he appeared to relish the idea of facing off against the Cronkite journalism profs in a Meet-the-Press-ish forum. “They’re gonna slam me,” he told me. You’ve got to understand that in Joe Arpaio’s lexicon, the words “slam me” don’t necessarily have a negative connotation. I mean, the sheriff doesn’t just sit there and answer questions. Instead, he shoots back with polished sound bites that signal to his conservative base that he’s on the job, sparring with those journos.
On Monday, the usual cast of Sheriff Joe’s supporters began showing up in front of the Cronkite building in downtown Phoenix at about 6 p.m. Here’s a picture of one supporter. 
The guy held two signs. One said: We love you Sheriff Joe! The other said: ASU students can’t read this sign. I’d say maybe thirty similarly minded supporters showed up. Some carried signs that said: Illegals Must Go. The protesters were mostly old Anglos who didn’t like illegal immigration. Or Mexicans. Some packed guns. (Although non-felons are allowed to carry guns in Arizona, they can’t pack on ASU campuses.) The cops asked the pro-Joe demonstrators to get rid of their sidearms. The demonstrators disappeared for a few minutes, then returned unarmed. Or so they said.
About three times as many anti-Arpaioists, non-students and college students of every race, carried signs with messages ranging from opposition to the sheriff’s alleged human-rights abuses of undocumented immigrants to suggestions that sheriff was a card-carrying member of the KKK.

Photo by Janessa Hilliard
A couple of these anti-Arpaioists also had guns.
One anti-Arpaioist packed a pistol and a World War II-era Russian rifle with a bayonet. The cops made him stand on the other side of Central Avenue.
The evening was progressing predictably. Just as they always do, the anti-Arpaioists waved aromatic sage smoke through the air to purify the place from bad pro-Joe vibes. They beat drums and pots. They chanted: Joe must go. A few of them wore black hoodies and bandannas around their faces so you could only see their eyes. These people understood street theater.
At the pizza store near the journalism school, I saw a sign on the door.

Photo by Terry Greene Sterling
It read: Arpaio Supporters Not Welcome. The assistant manager said he put the sign up because he didn’t “appreciate Aryan Brotherhood people” coming into his store.
By then, probably three hundred people had gathered outside of the Cronkite school. Maybe a fourth of the crowd consisted of cops and journalists.
Only students, professors and journalists were allowed inside the Cronkite building to hear the journalism professors question the sheriff. Those not affiliated with ASU could watch the hour-long forum on a giant screen outside, on the mall.
Inside, I couldn’t find a seat. Students crowded around the railings on the third floor. They perched on the stairs. Many were students I didn’t recognize. They weren’t journalism students.
At first, Sheriff Joe responded to questions with his usual sound bites. Stuff like “I answer only to the people of Maricopa County who have elected me.” But I heard an edge creep into his voice as he fielded well-researched questions about things that really matter–like the Sheriff’s alleged stonewalling of public records requests.
The students, our future journalists, were learning from seasoned professionals how to ask big-time politicos tough questions, persistently. Public records may sound boring, but journalists rely on them to figure out what’s going on in taxpayer-funded projects. Like the Iraq War. Or Sheriff Joe’s jails.
Public records are key to keeping government honest. As Americans, we have a right to see how our elected officials are spending taxpayer money and running taxpayer-funded projects. Of course, public officials don’t always want to hand over public records because if they do journalists will learn the truth and convey the truth to voters. Or maybe get them indicted.
So long story short, the Cronkite students were getting one heck of an education as they listened to their profs put Sheriff Joe’s feet to the fire about public records requests and other journalism-related questions.
My own feet were hurting, I couldn’t see the panel, so I wandered downstairs to see if I could catch the forum on the outside screen. Suddenly, dozens of protesters crowded into the lobby, blasting the journalism school for having the forum in the first place. It was all very Cal-Berkeley in the 1960’s.
Only this time, it was stupid.

Photo by Terry Greene Sterling

Photo by Terry Greene Sterling
What was the matter with the protesters, anyway? Couldn’t they see that the school was training future journalists? Didn’t they understand that students were learning how to interview powerful public figures who were rarely held accountable for their alleged abuses of power?
I walked over to the outside screen, where about a hundred people had gathered to watch the forum inside. To my surprise, Rick Rodriguez, a Cronkite prof who once ran The Sacramento Bee, was making the sheriff visibly uncomfortable as he asked persistent questions about why the sheriff refused to cooperate with the U.S. Justice Department, which is investigating the sheriff’s alleged retaliatory abuses of power against judges and mayors and politicians and cops who dared criticize him.
Then suddenly, the forum fell apart.
Non-journalism student protesters in the audience, those students I didn’t recognize who had crowded around the rails, began an organized demonstration that involved high-decibel singing and chanting and yelling. They wouldn’t stop. They wouldn’t shut up. They went on and on, preventing Rodriguez from getting key answers from the sheriff about why he would not cooperate with the agency investigating him for tormenting his enemies.
This was great for Sheriff Joe.
The demonstrators gave him an excuse to quit the forum just as it was getting very very awkward for him.
The sheriff left the building.
Scowling, of course.
I wondered if he was secretly relieved. Did the sheriff sense the truth–that Rodriguez would have pursued him into the gates of hell to learn why he wouldn’t cooperate with the Justice Department?
I think so.
And I don’t think the sheriff wanted to answer Professor Rodriguez’s questions.
For obvious reasons.
After the sheriff’s exit, the demonstrators were jubilant. They played music. They sang. They hugged each other. They climbed on a shelf and hung out a banner. Hey, they’d broken up the forum. They’d run the sheriff off the stage.
They were just kids. They didn’t understand that they had rescued Sheriff Joe.
They didn’t understand that thanks to them, Arizona’s most controversial public official avoided answering questions that mattered.
To all of us.

#1 by earthtobobby on December 1, 2009 - 12:42 am
Quote
Great job, Terry!
Trackback: uberVU - social comments
#2 by jeremie lederman on December 1, 2009 - 7:41 am
Quote
I think the only real free speech exercised that night must have been the sign in the window.
Not sure your passing comment that the pro-paio protestors are racists really accomplished anything.
#3 by AdamK on December 1, 2009 - 8:35 am
Quote
Nice post, Terry. I can’t agree more. I watched the results on CBS 5 last night, and I have to say, what a letdown. The Cronkite panelists were on point, but the unruly crowd – which is what I expected – essentially pulled the plug.
Then again, this was held in the C-school’s First Amendment Forum, so this is as it should be. Unfortunately, the public missed out on what could have been a great session. Boo.
#4 by Anne Stegen on December 1, 2009 - 9:48 am
Quote
Great find with that sign.
Joe uses the same talking points over and over, like he did last night.
I think everyone at Cronkite agrees we hate the “singers”.
I have to agree with Jeremie’s second point, though.
#5 by Jacki on December 1, 2009 - 10:02 am
Quote
Nice reporting
Pingback: Twitted by ljthornton
#6 by Carmen Cornejo on December 1, 2009 - 2:39 pm
Quote
Great comment.
That was the ending Joe was hoping for.
Joe has this incredibly ability of making everyone believe that he he is loosing, in retreat when in reality he is toying with us all the time.
Too bad the panel ended the way it did.
#7 by Clarice on December 1, 2009 - 3:04 pm
Quote
I wish I could have been there. The sheriff being run off the stage is a video on Yahoo, but I think your blog should be linked to it so people can understand. A friend of facebook posted the yahoo video link with glee saying how “sweet!” it was. I posted the link to your blog so she can read your account. People need to understand how important it is to make people accountable through our profession. Here’s the video link: http://cosmos.bcst.yahoo.com/up/player/popup/?rn=3906861&cl=16927589&ch=4226713&src=news
#8 by cornerstone on December 1, 2009 - 5:36 pm
Quote
great account. one question, though. if the purpose of the forum (implicit or explicit) was to train future journos, shouldn’t it have been restricted to j-students only? i mean, the behavior shouldn’t be a surprise, no? from beserkley to ahmadinejad at columbia, it’s a tradition of sorts. i can understand your frustration about how it ended, but seems like the school should take some blame for allowing the “misguided” non-j-students in.
#9 by esteban on December 1, 2009 - 5:40 pm
Quote
great job… thanks
#10 by Terry Greene Sterling on December 2, 2009 - 12:16 pm
Quote
The students were righteously angry, and frustrated with Arpaio and his policies. Since they weren’t journo students, though, they didn’t get the whole journalism component to the evening. I am not sure the school could have limited the crowd inside the building to journo students only. Anyway, the kids had a right to protest, it’s just that they were clueless about the journalism element.
#11 by Jill on December 2, 2009 - 3:11 pm
Quote
Ugh so frustrating!
#12 by Sarah on December 2, 2009 - 4:26 pm
Quote
Great insight, Terry. Journalists have to keep up the fight, glad the questions were asked — they have power.
#13 by Tanya Golash-Boza on December 3, 2009 - 10:59 am
Quote
I see your point about wanting Arpaiao to face the questions. However, it is likely that he would have avoided them, regardless of the protesting.
Good or bad, hosting Arpaiao was publicity for him, what he likes.
Without the protesting students, his supporters may have outnumbered the protestors. Their presence sent a message that educated folks are not fooled.
#14 by Bryan J. on December 3, 2009 - 4:59 pm
Quote
Nowadays, it seems many Protestors protest just for the sake of protesting. The one time I did attend a protest(remember the may day immigration demonstrations in 2006), it devolved into an “f-the police/iraq war is evil/rich people are evil” disaster. Anyway, I just found your blog and from the one article I have read so far(this one), I look forward to reading it in the future!